Some have said one thing, some have said other things, some have said we need to prioitize, some say we need to cut and some say we need to fix this or that problem.
One thing that a lot of people around Vancouver can agree on is that some thing needs to be done with the Interstate Five bridge that is coming up on one hundred years in 2017 for one of its spans. There has been a process that went through various levels and I won't dispute or cause problems with that now. Too many others have said what I have wanted to say so much more succinctly.
But the problems of congestion, moving freight efficiently through the interstate corridor that itself is nearing 60+ years old and mostly remains unchanged since its original basic structure within the region for the past thirty years, if not longer. I personally believe we need to start looking at other options PAST the columbia river crossing project that have been neglected for so long because one reason, excuse or another keeps getting uttered and not enough people or interest is pushing forward ideas to grow our economic base outside same two interstate corridors.
There has been some work done on the rail areas of Clark County at the county level to try to bring in more rail dependent jobs in the center of county and in the BNSF and Port of Vancouver areas. I also think I remember reading some where the the Port of Ridgefield and Woodland are talking about rail improvements themselves.
But when you look at our community that is really the bedroom region to the north of Portland (the southern being Clackamas County) to bring in enough workers to fuel their business expansion plans in Wilsonville, Hillsboro (think Nike, Intel, Addidas and others) and other counties of Oregon, some thing is serously wrong in my own personal opinion.
We have a growing 20 percent jobless rating in Clark County. A lot of comments have been made and referenced to poor taxing and regulatory frameworks and slow application processes to get shovel ready projects in case someone wanted to come in and build here. There has also been comments on the lack of information on the basic taxing structure from the state for out-of-state and local taxing issues.
"Live here, Land here" has been a business campaign being directed more at higher income, higher job proportionality jobs. Where is the campaigns to bring decent companies and innovators that might be small operations of one to fifty people? We have a small international airport in Portland that has some small international connections and a few, if not small airports to fly people who may have their own jets, yet there is no airport building because a lot of former small avation airports are being turned in high priced strip malls? Example Evergreen Airport, Clark County Aerdome and an abandon field up near Battle Ground called Cherry Grove field?
Now, how about our basic road infrastructure that we have talked about for some time needs repair. I'm directing my comments to the City of Vancouver at this point. But I do believe it is appropos for the county and other local, smaller cities. In the past because of MVET taxes, (cut down by a Tim Eyman initiative twice?) we did have the money to match federal and state grants until about two years ago when it finally was revealed that this year we would have enough for only 2011 to finish off some basic projects and then that would be it.
There might be a little bit of funds to do some minor pothole recovery or filling in cracks with sealent. But there simply is not much more than that. So there was a new article by Andrea Damewood (src: http://www.columbian.com/news/2011/nov/19/vote-to-urge-fee-riles-local-activists-committee-r/ ) this week talking about setting up a new city benefit district through probably either sliced sectioned districts throughout the city or small sectioned area like the CRC Light Rail/BRT projects that are coming up or a whole city with I hope a vote on the matter or decent time framed discussion to allow people the ability to discuss it before it goes into effect.
And finally, there has been suggestions at looking at creating a new bridge and interstate or highway from Battle Ground through the east side of Vancouver - Camas and go along eastern out edge of the more populace and growing areas of our community. The reason why I don't think that its an option right now, is there has been talk that the economy is slowing down and we have an excess inventory of housing, commercial and industrial areas open and ready to be used. If those were used up, then Portland has a bunch of areas that could use some filling up?
And if you look just to the neighbor to our north, Seattle. It too has a commercial market that is overloaded with the same problem properties. Though they have an additional problem of higher income condominiums, strip malls and bankrupt lender commercial properties that you will find in Vancouver as much though they do have a serious impact on our economy because we have a number of builders who may still have debts owed on that work that was done and were never paid.
All of this comes down to the economics of the situation: The City of Vancouver, Clark County, the State, the Feds and the region around us are still smarting from an economy that is still spiraling down. This effects us in how we will be able to finance bonds to pay for freeway miles, more road maintenance, bridges and highway contruction, right-of-way acquisition to built more highway corridors and on and on!
So what does this basically say, some may ask. I might suggest to all who may read this. Contact your political leadership, invest some time in researching the issues and discuss with them either through emails, phone call to their offices or contacts, face-to-face contact or even a well written, supported letter?
Get involved. Find out what the issues are. We NEED you!